Projects & capital
Manage Maintenance Today and Capital Planning Tomorrow
Replacement decisions should be made from operating evidence, and the resulting project should hand back better data than it received.
The business problem
Capital planning disconnected from operations
Replacement programmes are built from age and budget availability rather than observed condition. Projects are then delivered by teams working outside the operational system, and the handover leaves the facilities team to rediscover what was installed.
The IntelliGrid approach
One evidence base from condition to commissioning
Condition, fault history and predictive risk inform the replacement case. The resulting project is tracked with budget, timeline and contractor accountability, and commissioning results and documentation are written back to the asset record.
Scope
What this covers
Renovation
Fit-out and refurbishment coordinated with live building operations.
Capex planning
Multi-year replacement demand aggregated across a portfolio.
Replacement
Prioritised by condition, criticality and observed degradation.
Commissioning
Structured results captured and retained against each asset.
Handover
Register updates, documents and PPM plans established at completion.
Project documents
Drawings, submittals and certificates linked to assets and spaces.
Budget
Committed and actual cost tracked against approved budget.
Timeline
Milestones and dependencies with progress visibility.
Contractors
Scope, access, permits and performance managed in-platform.
Workflow
From case to handover
Business benefits
Connects with
Plan capital work from operating evidence
We will look at how condition and risk data can support your replacement programme.